Review



tubulin glycerol buffer  (Cytoskeleton Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cytoskeleton Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cytoskeleton Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Cytoskeleton Inc tubulin glycerol buffer
    Representative lowest energy docking poses of (a) cis -PST-1, (b) trans -PST-1, (c) cis -proPST-1, and (d) trans -proPST-1 within the colchicine binding pocket of <t>tubulin</t> (PDB ID: 5LYJ). Ligands are represented as orange sticks, while interacting amino acid residues are shown as yellow sticks and labelled using single-letter amino acid notation. Hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions are indicated by red and blue dashed lines, respectively, with corresponding interaction distances (Å) shown. Structures and interaction maps were generated using PyMOL v3.0.
    Tubulin Glycerol Buffer, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 30 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cushion+buffer/Tubulin+glycerol+buffer+cushion+buffer/pmc13673699-47-20-36
    Average 94 stars, based on 30 article reviews
    tubulin glycerol buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Simultaneous activation and release of a microtubule inhibitor from amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles"

    Article Title: Simultaneous activation and release of a microtubule inhibitor from amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles

    Journal: Nanoscale Advances

    doi: 10.1039/d6na00763e

    Representative lowest energy docking poses of (a) cis -PST-1, (b) trans -PST-1, (c) cis -proPST-1, and (d) trans -proPST-1 within the colchicine binding pocket of tubulin (PDB ID: 5LYJ). Ligands are represented as orange sticks, while interacting amino acid residues are shown as yellow sticks and labelled using single-letter amino acid notation. Hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions are indicated by red and blue dashed lines, respectively, with corresponding interaction distances (Å) shown. Structures and interaction maps were generated using PyMOL v3.0.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Representative lowest energy docking poses of (a) cis -PST-1, (b) trans -PST-1, (c) cis -proPST-1, and (d) trans -proPST-1 within the colchicine binding pocket of tubulin (PDB ID: 5LYJ). Ligands are represented as orange sticks, while interacting amino acid residues are shown as yellow sticks and labelled using single-letter amino acid notation. Hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions are indicated by red and blue dashed lines, respectively, with corresponding interaction distances (Å) shown. Structures and interaction maps were generated using PyMOL v3.0.

    Techniques Used: Docking Assay, Binding Assay, Generated

    (a) Schematic representation of light-controlled inhibition of microtubule polymerisation by proPST-1-loaded polymer nanoparticles (proPST-1@PN). Under dark conditions, the encapsulated photocaged prodrug remains inactive, allowing normal microtubule formation. Upon 365 nm irradiation, photolytic uncaging and release of active cis -PST-1 suppress microtubule assembly. Created in BioRender. Singh, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/fac5r0eT . (b) Tubulin polymerisation kinetics monitored by absorbance at 340 nm for control samples, empty polymer nanoparticles (PN control), and proPST-1@PN under dark and irradiated conditions. Irradiation of proPST-1@PN results in pronounced inhibition of tubulin polymerisation, whereas no inhibition is observed in the dark. (c) Fluorescence microscopy images of microtubule structures formed in the presence of control samples, proPST-1@PN under dark conditions, and irradiated proPST-1@PN. Normal microtubule growth and network formation are observed in control and dark conditions, while irradiation results in substantial disruption of microtubule assembly. Scale bars: 10 µm.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (a) Schematic representation of light-controlled inhibition of microtubule polymerisation by proPST-1-loaded polymer nanoparticles (proPST-1@PN). Under dark conditions, the encapsulated photocaged prodrug remains inactive, allowing normal microtubule formation. Upon 365 nm irradiation, photolytic uncaging and release of active cis -PST-1 suppress microtubule assembly. Created in BioRender. Singh, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/fac5r0eT . (b) Tubulin polymerisation kinetics monitored by absorbance at 340 nm for control samples, empty polymer nanoparticles (PN control), and proPST-1@PN under dark and irradiated conditions. Irradiation of proPST-1@PN results in pronounced inhibition of tubulin polymerisation, whereas no inhibition is observed in the dark. (c) Fluorescence microscopy images of microtubule structures formed in the presence of control samples, proPST-1@PN under dark conditions, and irradiated proPST-1@PN. Normal microtubule growth and network formation are observed in control and dark conditions, while irradiation results in substantial disruption of microtubule assembly. Scale bars: 10 µm.

    Techniques Used: Inhibition, Polymer, Irradiation, Control, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Disruption

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: The open to closed D-loop conformational switch determines length in filopodia-like actin bundles
    Article Snippet: For each assay, 52.5 μl of cushion buffer (2.5 μl 10x actin polymerization buffer (Cytoskeleton #BSA02), 7 μl glycerol, 2 μl ddH 2 O, 1 μl 10x PBS, 40 μl general actin buffer) was prepared and added to the bottom of the ultracentrifuge tube (2.5 μl 10x polymerization buffer [500 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl 2 , 10 mM ATP].

    Article Title: Disassembly of microtubules by intense terahertz pulses
    Article Snippet: Growth of fluorescently labelled microtubules Rhodamine-labelled fluorescent tubulin (excitation/emission at 543/590 nm) was obtained from Cytoskeleton (Denver, USA), and MTs were polymerized according to the manufacturers’ instructions [ 37 ].

    Article Title: KNL1 Binding to PP1 and Microtubules Is Mutually Exclusive.
    Article Snippet: Each 50 ml reaction was loaded onto 200 ml of cushion buffer (80 mM PIPES pH 7.0, 2 mM MgCl2 0.5 mM EGTA, 60% glycerol, Cytoskeleton, Inc.) and centrifuged for 40 minutes at 25 C and 100,000 xg, as per manufacturer protocol.

    Article Title: Disassembly of microtubules by intense terahertz pulses
    Article Snippet: One aliquot of rhodamine tubulin (Cytoskeleton, TL590M) was resuspended to 5 mg/mL (45.5 μM) in 4.0 μL of general tubulin buffer (Cytoskeleton, BST01) supplemented with 0.01 volumes of 100 mM GTP (Cytoskeleton, BST06) and 1 μL of MT cushion buffer (Cytoskeleton, BST05) to facilitate polymerization.

    Article Title: The open to closed D-loop conformational switch determines length in filopodia-like actin bundles
    Article Snippet: For each assay, 52.5 ml of cushion buffer (2.5 ml 10x actin polymerization buffer polymerization buffer [500 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 10 mM ATP] (Cytoskeleton #BSA02), 7 ml glycerol, 2 ml ddH2O, 1 ml 10x PBS, 40 ml general actin buffer) was prepared and added to the bottom of the ultracentrifuge tube.

    Article Title:
    Article Snippet: The samples were then layered on cushion buffer (Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO, USA) to optimize microtubule polymerization (Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO, USA) and centrifuged at 100,000 g for 40 minutes.

    Article Title: The open to closed D-loop conformational switch determines length in filopodia-like actin bundles
    Article Snippet: For each assay, 52.5 μl of cushion buffer (2.5 μl 10x actin polymerization buffer polymerization buffer [500 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl 2 , 10 mM ATP] (Cytoskeleton #BSA02), 7 μl glycerol, 2 μl ddH 2 O, 1 μl 10x PBS, 40 μl general actin buffer) was prepared and added to the bottom of the ultracentrifuge tube.

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Novel lissencephaly-associated DCX variants in the C-terminal DCX domain affect microtubule binding and dynamics.
    Article Snippet: 1Institute of Brain Science, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan 2Department of Pediatric Neurology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan 3Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan 4Division of Epilepsy, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 5Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan 6Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 7Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan 8Department of Pediatric Neurology, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan 9Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, China 10Department of Pediatrics, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan 11College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan 12Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 13Department of Biological Science and Technology, College of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan



    Similar Products

    94
    Cytoskeleton Inc tubulin glycerol buffer
    Representative lowest energy docking poses of (a) cis -PST-1, (b) trans -PST-1, (c) cis -proPST-1, and (d) trans -proPST-1 within the colchicine binding pocket of <t>tubulin</t> (PDB ID: 5LYJ). Ligands are represented as orange sticks, while interacting amino acid residues are shown as yellow sticks and labelled using single-letter amino acid notation. Hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions are indicated by red and blue dashed lines, respectively, with corresponding interaction distances (Å) shown. Structures and interaction maps were generated using PyMOL v3.0.
    Tubulin Glycerol Buffer, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cushion+buffer/Tubulin+glycerol+buffer+cushion+buffer/pmc13673699-47-20-36
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tubulin glycerol buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher sucrose cushion buffer
    Representative lowest energy docking poses of (a) cis -PST-1, (b) trans -PST-1, (c) cis -proPST-1, and (d) trans -proPST-1 within the colchicine binding pocket of <t>tubulin</t> (PDB ID: 5LYJ). Ligands are represented as orange sticks, while interacting amino acid residues are shown as yellow sticks and labelled using single-letter amino acid notation. Hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions are indicated by red and blue dashed lines, respectively, with corresponding interaction distances (Å) shown. Structures and interaction maps were generated using PyMOL v3.0.
    Sucrose Cushion Buffer, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cushion+buffer/TRIS-HCL/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__25__714110-91-17-46
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sucrose cushion buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cytoskeleton Inc tubulin
    a Time-resolved (0.5, 4 and 72 hr) confocal microscopy of Tau, αSyn, and <t>Tubulin</t> <t>mixtures</t> at varying concentrations (0–20 µM) in LLPS buffer. Mixtures also included fluorescently labeled Tau-A488, αSyn-A647, and Rhodamine-Tubulin (Rh-Tub) at labeled to unlabeled protein concentration ratios of 1:40, 1:50 and 1:50, respectively. Scale bars = 50 µm. b Representative conditions from ‘a’ showing morphological difference between droplets and Tubulin-rich tactoids. c Quantification of shape eccentricity in select conditions (20 µM Tau and 10 µM αSyn ± 10 µM Tubulin after 4 hr). n = 3 images with at least 80 droplets/image. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA: **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. d FRAP data of Tau/αSyn ± Tubulin condensates from b . n = 3 independently prepared samples, Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. e Partition efficiency (ratio of mean fluorescence intensity inside condensates vs. in the dilute phase) of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin mixtures (represented in ‘ a ’). n = 4 independently prepared samples, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p = 0.001, **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. f Average partition efficiency (across all Tau and αSyn concentrations in graphs shown in ‘ e ’) of Tau (green) and αSyn (blue) at different Tubulin concentrations. n = 3 independent samples including the various concentrations of Tau and αSyn, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. g Cartoon representation of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin ternary system (morphological diagram). The diagram depicts phase and morphological transitions based on confocal images ‘ a ’, western blots of oligomers (Fig. ) and dot blot amyloid assays (Fig. ).
    Tubulin, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cushion+buffer/Tubulin+glycerol+buffer+cushion+buffer/pmc13065850-339-6-7
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tubulin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Thermo Fisher cushion buffer
    a Time-resolved (0.5, 4 and 72 hr) confocal microscopy of Tau, αSyn, and <t>Tubulin</t> <t>mixtures</t> at varying concentrations (0–20 µM) in LLPS buffer. Mixtures also included fluorescently labeled Tau-A488, αSyn-A647, and Rhodamine-Tubulin (Rh-Tub) at labeled to unlabeled protein concentration ratios of 1:40, 1:50 and 1:50, respectively. Scale bars = 50 µm. b Representative conditions from ‘a’ showing morphological difference between droplets and Tubulin-rich tactoids. c Quantification of shape eccentricity in select conditions (20 µM Tau and 10 µM αSyn ± 10 µM Tubulin after 4 hr). n = 3 images with at least 80 droplets/image. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA: **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. d FRAP data of Tau/αSyn ± Tubulin condensates from b . n = 3 independently prepared samples, Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. e Partition efficiency (ratio of mean fluorescence intensity inside condensates vs. in the dilute phase) of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin mixtures (represented in ‘ a ’). n = 4 independently prepared samples, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p = 0.001, **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. f Average partition efficiency (across all Tau and αSyn concentrations in graphs shown in ‘ e ’) of Tau (green) and αSyn (blue) at different Tubulin concentrations. n = 3 independent samples including the various concentrations of Tau and αSyn, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. g Cartoon representation of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin ternary system (morphological diagram). The diagram depicts phase and morphological transitions based on confocal images ‘ a ’, western blots of oligomers (Fig. ) and dot blot amyloid assays (Fig. ).
    Cushion Buffer, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cushion+buffer/Sucrose/pmc12445524-246-24-49
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cushion buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cytoskeleton Inc buffer tdb
    a Time-resolved (0.5, 4 and 72 hr) confocal microscopy of Tau, αSyn, and <t>Tubulin</t> <t>mixtures</t> at varying concentrations (0–20 µM) in LLPS buffer. Mixtures also included fluorescently labeled Tau-A488, αSyn-A647, and Rhodamine-Tubulin (Rh-Tub) at labeled to unlabeled protein concentration ratios of 1:40, 1:50 and 1:50, respectively. Scale bars = 50 µm. b Representative conditions from ‘a’ showing morphological difference between droplets and Tubulin-rich tactoids. c Quantification of shape eccentricity in select conditions (20 µM Tau and 10 µM αSyn ± 10 µM Tubulin after 4 hr). n = 3 images with at least 80 droplets/image. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA: **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. d FRAP data of Tau/αSyn ± Tubulin condensates from b . n = 3 independently prepared samples, Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. e Partition efficiency (ratio of mean fluorescence intensity inside condensates vs. in the dilute phase) of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin mixtures (represented in ‘ a ’). n = 4 independently prepared samples, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p = 0.001, **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. f Average partition efficiency (across all Tau and αSyn concentrations in graphs shown in ‘ e ’) of Tau (green) and αSyn (blue) at different Tubulin concentrations. n = 3 independent samples including the various concentrations of Tau and αSyn, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. g Cartoon representation of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin ternary system (morphological diagram). The diagram depicts phase and morphological transitions based on confocal images ‘ a ’, western blots of oligomers (Fig. ) and dot blot amyloid assays (Fig. ).
    Buffer Tdb, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cushion+buffer/Tubulin+glycerol+buffer+cushion+buffer/bio_rxiv__2025__09__09__675178-302-14-47
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    buffer tdb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cytoskeleton Inc tubulin buffer
    a Time-resolved (0.5, 4 and 72 hr) confocal microscopy of Tau, αSyn, and <t>Tubulin</t> <t>mixtures</t> at varying concentrations (0–20 µM) in LLPS buffer. Mixtures also included fluorescently labeled Tau-A488, αSyn-A647, and Rhodamine-Tubulin (Rh-Tub) at labeled to unlabeled protein concentration ratios of 1:40, 1:50 and 1:50, respectively. Scale bars = 50 µm. b Representative conditions from ‘a’ showing morphological difference between droplets and Tubulin-rich tactoids. c Quantification of shape eccentricity in select conditions (20 µM Tau and 10 µM αSyn ± 10 µM Tubulin after 4 hr). n = 3 images with at least 80 droplets/image. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA: **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. d FRAP data of Tau/αSyn ± Tubulin condensates from b . n = 3 independently prepared samples, Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. e Partition efficiency (ratio of mean fluorescence intensity inside condensates vs. in the dilute phase) of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin mixtures (represented in ‘ a ’). n = 4 independently prepared samples, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p = 0.001, **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. f Average partition efficiency (across all Tau and αSyn concentrations in graphs shown in ‘ e ’) of Tau (green) and αSyn (blue) at different Tubulin concentrations. n = 3 independent samples including the various concentrations of Tau and αSyn, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. g Cartoon representation of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin ternary system (morphological diagram). The diagram depicts phase and morphological transitions based on confocal images ‘ a ’, western blots of oligomers (Fig. ) and dot blot amyloid assays (Fig. ).
    Tubulin Buffer, supplied by Cytoskeleton Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/cushion+buffer/Tubulin+glycerol+buffer+cushion+buffer/pmc12094232-168-1-25
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tubulin buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Representative lowest energy docking poses of (a) cis -PST-1, (b) trans -PST-1, (c) cis -proPST-1, and (d) trans -proPST-1 within the colchicine binding pocket of tubulin (PDB ID: 5LYJ). Ligands are represented as orange sticks, while interacting amino acid residues are shown as yellow sticks and labelled using single-letter amino acid notation. Hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions are indicated by red and blue dashed lines, respectively, with corresponding interaction distances (Å) shown. Structures and interaction maps were generated using PyMOL v3.0.

    Journal: Nanoscale Advances

    Article Title: Simultaneous activation and release of a microtubule inhibitor from amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles

    doi: 10.1039/d6na00763e

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative lowest energy docking poses of (a) cis -PST-1, (b) trans -PST-1, (c) cis -proPST-1, and (d) trans -proPST-1 within the colchicine binding pocket of tubulin (PDB ID: 5LYJ). Ligands are represented as orange sticks, while interacting amino acid residues are shown as yellow sticks and labelled using single-letter amino acid notation. Hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions are indicated by red and blue dashed lines, respectively, with corresponding interaction distances (Å) shown. Structures and interaction maps were generated using PyMOL v3.0.

    Article Snippet: Tubulin MAP-rich (porcine brain) (Cat. #ML116), Tubulin protein (fluorescent HiLyte 488): porcine brain (Cat. #TL488M), General tubulin buffer (Cat. #BST01), Tubulin glycerol buffer (Cat. #BST05) and Taxol (Cat. #TXD01) and GTP (Cat. #BTS06) were obtained from Cytoskeleton, Inc and used as per the instruction manual.

    Techniques: Docking Assay, Binding Assay, Generated

    (a) Schematic representation of light-controlled inhibition of microtubule polymerisation by proPST-1-loaded polymer nanoparticles (proPST-1@PN). Under dark conditions, the encapsulated photocaged prodrug remains inactive, allowing normal microtubule formation. Upon 365 nm irradiation, photolytic uncaging and release of active cis -PST-1 suppress microtubule assembly. Created in BioRender. Singh, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/fac5r0eT . (b) Tubulin polymerisation kinetics monitored by absorbance at 340 nm for control samples, empty polymer nanoparticles (PN control), and proPST-1@PN under dark and irradiated conditions. Irradiation of proPST-1@PN results in pronounced inhibition of tubulin polymerisation, whereas no inhibition is observed in the dark. (c) Fluorescence microscopy images of microtubule structures formed in the presence of control samples, proPST-1@PN under dark conditions, and irradiated proPST-1@PN. Normal microtubule growth and network formation are observed in control and dark conditions, while irradiation results in substantial disruption of microtubule assembly. Scale bars: 10 µm.

    Journal: Nanoscale Advances

    Article Title: Simultaneous activation and release of a microtubule inhibitor from amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles

    doi: 10.1039/d6na00763e

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Schematic representation of light-controlled inhibition of microtubule polymerisation by proPST-1-loaded polymer nanoparticles (proPST-1@PN). Under dark conditions, the encapsulated photocaged prodrug remains inactive, allowing normal microtubule formation. Upon 365 nm irradiation, photolytic uncaging and release of active cis -PST-1 suppress microtubule assembly. Created in BioRender. Singh, H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/fac5r0eT . (b) Tubulin polymerisation kinetics monitored by absorbance at 340 nm for control samples, empty polymer nanoparticles (PN control), and proPST-1@PN under dark and irradiated conditions. Irradiation of proPST-1@PN results in pronounced inhibition of tubulin polymerisation, whereas no inhibition is observed in the dark. (c) Fluorescence microscopy images of microtubule structures formed in the presence of control samples, proPST-1@PN under dark conditions, and irradiated proPST-1@PN. Normal microtubule growth and network formation are observed in control and dark conditions, while irradiation results in substantial disruption of microtubule assembly. Scale bars: 10 µm.

    Article Snippet: Tubulin MAP-rich (porcine brain) (Cat. #ML116), Tubulin protein (fluorescent HiLyte 488): porcine brain (Cat. #TL488M), General tubulin buffer (Cat. #BST01), Tubulin glycerol buffer (Cat. #BST05) and Taxol (Cat. #TXD01) and GTP (Cat. #BTS06) were obtained from Cytoskeleton, Inc and used as per the instruction manual.

    Techniques: Inhibition, Polymer, Irradiation, Control, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Disruption

    a Time-resolved (0.5, 4 and 72 hr) confocal microscopy of Tau, αSyn, and Tubulin mixtures at varying concentrations (0–20 µM) in LLPS buffer. Mixtures also included fluorescently labeled Tau-A488, αSyn-A647, and Rhodamine-Tubulin (Rh-Tub) at labeled to unlabeled protein concentration ratios of 1:40, 1:50 and 1:50, respectively. Scale bars = 50 µm. b Representative conditions from ‘a’ showing morphological difference between droplets and Tubulin-rich tactoids. c Quantification of shape eccentricity in select conditions (20 µM Tau and 10 µM αSyn ± 10 µM Tubulin after 4 hr). n = 3 images with at least 80 droplets/image. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA: **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. d FRAP data of Tau/αSyn ± Tubulin condensates from b . n = 3 independently prepared samples, Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. e Partition efficiency (ratio of mean fluorescence intensity inside condensates vs. in the dilute phase) of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin mixtures (represented in ‘ a ’). n = 4 independently prepared samples, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p = 0.001, **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. f Average partition efficiency (across all Tau and αSyn concentrations in graphs shown in ‘ e ’) of Tau (green) and αSyn (blue) at different Tubulin concentrations. n = 3 independent samples including the various concentrations of Tau and αSyn, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. g Cartoon representation of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin ternary system (morphological diagram). The diagram depicts phase and morphological transitions based on confocal images ‘ a ’, western blots of oligomers (Fig. ) and dot blot amyloid assays (Fig. ).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Tubulin transforms Tau and α-synuclein condensates from pathological to physiological

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69618-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Time-resolved (0.5, 4 and 72 hr) confocal microscopy of Tau, αSyn, and Tubulin mixtures at varying concentrations (0–20 µM) in LLPS buffer. Mixtures also included fluorescently labeled Tau-A488, αSyn-A647, and Rhodamine-Tubulin (Rh-Tub) at labeled to unlabeled protein concentration ratios of 1:40, 1:50 and 1:50, respectively. Scale bars = 50 µm. b Representative conditions from ‘a’ showing morphological difference between droplets and Tubulin-rich tactoids. c Quantification of shape eccentricity in select conditions (20 µM Tau and 10 µM αSyn ± 10 µM Tubulin after 4 hr). n = 3 images with at least 80 droplets/image. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA: **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. d FRAP data of Tau/αSyn ± Tubulin condensates from b . n = 3 independently prepared samples, Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. e Partition efficiency (ratio of mean fluorescence intensity inside condensates vs. in the dilute phase) of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin mixtures (represented in ‘ a ’). n = 4 independently prepared samples, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p = 0.001, **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. f Average partition efficiency (across all Tau and αSyn concentrations in graphs shown in ‘ e ’) of Tau (green) and αSyn (blue) at different Tubulin concentrations. n = 3 independent samples including the various concentrations of Tau and αSyn, statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. g Cartoon representation of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin ternary system (morphological diagram). The diagram depicts phase and morphological transitions based on confocal images ‘ a ’, western blots of oligomers (Fig. ) and dot blot amyloid assays (Fig. ).

    Article Snippet: Solution mixtures with Tau, αSyn, and Tubulin (Cytoskeleton, Inc.) or combinations of the three were prepared by diluting the proteins to their respective concentrations in LLPS buffer.

    Techniques: Confocal Microscopy, Labeling, Protein Concentration, Fluorescence, Western Blot, Dot Blot

    Representative western blots (anti-Tau, a ; anti-αSyn, b ) of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin samples (pellet fraction) incubated for 0, 16, and 36 hr in LLPS buffer. Orange asterisks (*) and *TS refer to Tau/αSyn heterodimers. c – e Quantification of bands in blots represented in ‘ a ’ and ‘ b ’ ( n = 3 wells from independently prepared samples), showing Tau HMW oligomers (larger than Tau trimer), αSyn HMW oligomers (larger than monomer), and Tau/αSyn (TS) heterodimers, respectively. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons, * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. f Representative ( n = 3) amyloid dot blot assay (anti-OC) of Tau, αSyn, and Tubulin in different combinations (20 µM each), incubated for ~20 days. 2 µM Amyloid beta (Aβ) was used as reference. g Quantitation of dot blots ( n = 3 dotted regions from independently prepared samples) normalized to Aβ intensity. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons; *** p = 0.001, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Tubulin transforms Tau and α-synuclein condensates from pathological to physiological

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69618-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative western blots (anti-Tau, a ; anti-αSyn, b ) of Tau/αSyn/Tubulin samples (pellet fraction) incubated for 0, 16, and 36 hr in LLPS buffer. Orange asterisks (*) and *TS refer to Tau/αSyn heterodimers. c – e Quantification of bands in blots represented in ‘ a ’ and ‘ b ’ ( n = 3 wells from independently prepared samples), showing Tau HMW oligomers (larger than Tau trimer), αSyn HMW oligomers (larger than monomer), and Tau/αSyn (TS) heterodimers, respectively. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons, * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. f Representative ( n = 3) amyloid dot blot assay (anti-OC) of Tau, αSyn, and Tubulin in different combinations (20 µM each), incubated for ~20 days. 2 µM Amyloid beta (Aβ) was used as reference. g Quantitation of dot blots ( n = 3 dotted regions from independently prepared samples) normalized to Aβ intensity. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons; *** p = 0.001, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM.

    Article Snippet: Solution mixtures with Tau, αSyn, and Tubulin (Cytoskeleton, Inc.) or combinations of the three were prepared by diluting the proteins to their respective concentrations in LLPS buffer.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Incubation, Dot Blot, Quantitation Assay

    a Tau and αSyn domain organization highlighting the locations of the Alexa Fluor dyes (cyan and yellow spheres) for FRET detection. CryoEM structures of Tau amyloids (5O3L), αSyn amyloids (2N0A) and extended Tau on microtubules (EMD-7522). b Representative confocal and FLIM images of Tau (C290/380-A488/594, ~ 20 nM) in the presence of αSyn, without Tubulin. Dilute (D) and condensate (C) images were generated by intensity thresholding, with donor lifetime histograms shown. Scale bars = 10 µm c Representative confocal and FLIM images of αSyn (C7/84-A488/594, ~ 20 nM) in the presence of Tau, without Tubulin. D and C images were generated by intensity thresholding, with donor lifetime histograms shown. d Violin plot of FLIM donor lifetimes of Tau (C291/380- A488/594) (left) or αSyn (C7/84- A488/594) (right) for various conditions (Tau ± αSyn ± Tubulin, Supplemental Fig. ). D and C represent measurements made in the dilute and condensed phases, respectively. n = 5, statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p = 0.001, **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. Violin spread = SD, center of violin = mean, width of violin = distribution. Scale bars = 10 µm e FRET-FLIM images of αSyn (C7/84- A488/594) in conditions with and without Tubulin. FRET-FLIM histograms show distinct αSyn conformations. f Phasor analysis of the dual-labeled FRET αSyn. Confocal images were collected for each of the 5 independently prepared samples. Scale bars = 10 µm g FRET-FLIM images of Tau (C291/380- A488/594) in conditions with and without Tubulin. FRET-FLIM histograms show distinct Tau conformations. Confocal images were collected for each of the 5 independently prepared samples. Scale bars = 10 µm h, Phasor analysis of the dual-labeled FRET Tau mixtures with and without Tubulin. For both phasor plots, numbers within clusters indicate mean phase lifetimes ( τ Ψ) . i Schematic diagram for how the presence of Tubulin transforms Tau/αSyn pathological to Tau/αSyn/Tubulin physiological condensates with corresponding favored Tau and αSyn conformations.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Tubulin transforms Tau and α-synuclein condensates from pathological to physiological

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69618-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Tau and αSyn domain organization highlighting the locations of the Alexa Fluor dyes (cyan and yellow spheres) for FRET detection. CryoEM structures of Tau amyloids (5O3L), αSyn amyloids (2N0A) and extended Tau on microtubules (EMD-7522). b Representative confocal and FLIM images of Tau (C290/380-A488/594, ~ 20 nM) in the presence of αSyn, without Tubulin. Dilute (D) and condensate (C) images were generated by intensity thresholding, with donor lifetime histograms shown. Scale bars = 10 µm c Representative confocal and FLIM images of αSyn (C7/84-A488/594, ~ 20 nM) in the presence of Tau, without Tubulin. D and C images were generated by intensity thresholding, with donor lifetime histograms shown. d Violin plot of FLIM donor lifetimes of Tau (C291/380- A488/594) (left) or αSyn (C7/84- A488/594) (right) for various conditions (Tau ± αSyn ± Tubulin, Supplemental Fig. ). D and C represent measurements made in the dilute and condensed phases, respectively. n = 5, statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p = 0.001, **** p = 0.0001, ns = not significant. Violin spread = SD, center of violin = mean, width of violin = distribution. Scale bars = 10 µm e FRET-FLIM images of αSyn (C7/84- A488/594) in conditions with and without Tubulin. FRET-FLIM histograms show distinct αSyn conformations. f Phasor analysis of the dual-labeled FRET αSyn. Confocal images were collected for each of the 5 independently prepared samples. Scale bars = 10 µm g FRET-FLIM images of Tau (C291/380- A488/594) in conditions with and without Tubulin. FRET-FLIM histograms show distinct Tau conformations. Confocal images were collected for each of the 5 independently prepared samples. Scale bars = 10 µm h, Phasor analysis of the dual-labeled FRET Tau mixtures with and without Tubulin. For both phasor plots, numbers within clusters indicate mean phase lifetimes ( τ Ψ) . i Schematic diagram for how the presence of Tubulin transforms Tau/αSyn pathological to Tau/αSyn/Tubulin physiological condensates with corresponding favored Tau and αSyn conformations.

    Article Snippet: Solution mixtures with Tau, αSyn, and Tubulin (Cytoskeleton, Inc.) or combinations of the three were prepared by diluting the proteins to their respective concentrations in LLPS buffer.

    Techniques: Generated, Labeling

    a Western blots (anti-α-Tubulin, -Tau, -pTau, -αSyn and -GAPDH; top to bottom) of undifferentiated mouse N2a cells with and without Tubulin siRNA transfection. Quantification of α-Tubulin, αSyn, Tau, and pTau oligomer levels (for αSyn, only oligomers above 100 kDa were considered) normalized to GAPDH (α-Tubulin siRNA transfection, hashed bars vs. untransfected cells, unhashed bars). n = 3 biological replicates loaded into independent wells, statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. b Tau optogenetic construct (OptoTau: Tau-mCherry-Cry2, red) stably expressed in undifferentiated human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Cells were treated with the oxidative stress agent okadaic acid (OA; 25 nM, 18 hr). Blue light activation (458 nm laser, 100% power, 20 min) was performed in localized target regions of interest (ROIs) ( ~ 5 µm ROI; yellow dash lines; performed on 3 independent replicates). Scale bars = 1 μm. c Cry2-Tau colocalization with microtubules in both the absence and presence of blue light in SH-SY5Y cells, performed on 3 independent replicates, treated with 25 nM OA to model ND-related stress Cry2- mcherry-Tau (red), Sir-Tubulin (green). Scale bar = 10 μm. d Confocal microscopy images of N2a cells stably co-expressing OptoTau (red) and GFP-αSyn (green). Cells were either transfected with α-Tubulin siRNA or treated with OA (25 nM, 18 hr). Plot of % neurites (ratio of number of neurites vs. total cells, n = 3 biological replicates). Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05. Error bars = SD. Scale bars = 20 µm. d Representative images of N2a cells stably co-expressing OptoTau and GFP-αSyn stressed with 25 nM OA for 18 hr. Cell boundaries are outlined in yellow dashes. Blue light activation (20 min) resulted in enhanced colocalization of OptoTau and GFP-αSyn (yellow). Error bars = positive SD Scale bars = 2 μm.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Tubulin transforms Tau and α-synuclein condensates from pathological to physiological

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69618-3

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Western blots (anti-α-Tubulin, -Tau, -pTau, -αSyn and -GAPDH; top to bottom) of undifferentiated mouse N2a cells with and without Tubulin siRNA transfection. Quantification of α-Tubulin, αSyn, Tau, and pTau oligomer levels (for αSyn, only oligomers above 100 kDa were considered) normalized to GAPDH (α-Tubulin siRNA transfection, hashed bars vs. untransfected cells, unhashed bars). n = 3 biological replicates loaded into independent wells, statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05, ** p = 0.01, ns = not significant. Error bars = SEM. b Tau optogenetic construct (OptoTau: Tau-mCherry-Cry2, red) stably expressed in undifferentiated human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Cells were treated with the oxidative stress agent okadaic acid (OA; 25 nM, 18 hr). Blue light activation (458 nm laser, 100% power, 20 min) was performed in localized target regions of interest (ROIs) ( ~ 5 µm ROI; yellow dash lines; performed on 3 independent replicates). Scale bars = 1 μm. c Cry2-Tau colocalization with microtubules in both the absence and presence of blue light in SH-SY5Y cells, performed on 3 independent replicates, treated with 25 nM OA to model ND-related stress Cry2- mcherry-Tau (red), Sir-Tubulin (green). Scale bar = 10 μm. d Confocal microscopy images of N2a cells stably co-expressing OptoTau (red) and GFP-αSyn (green). Cells were either transfected with α-Tubulin siRNA or treated with OA (25 nM, 18 hr). Plot of % neurites (ratio of number of neurites vs. total cells, n = 3 biological replicates). Statistical analysis: One-way ANOVA; * p = 0.05. Error bars = SD. Scale bars = 20 µm. d Representative images of N2a cells stably co-expressing OptoTau and GFP-αSyn stressed with 25 nM OA for 18 hr. Cell boundaries are outlined in yellow dashes. Blue light activation (20 min) resulted in enhanced colocalization of OptoTau and GFP-αSyn (yellow). Error bars = positive SD Scale bars = 2 μm.

    Article Snippet: Solution mixtures with Tau, αSyn, and Tubulin (Cytoskeleton, Inc.) or combinations of the three were prepared by diluting the proteins to their respective concentrations in LLPS buffer.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Transfection, Construct, Stable Transfection, Activation Assay, Confocal Microscopy, Expressing